Aristotle on Mimesis

The ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle (384–322 BCE), regarded mimesis, or imitation, to be one of the distinctive aspects of human nature, and a lway to understand the nature of art.

Aristotle describes the processes and purposes of mimesis:

objects that are thus distinct. Such diversities may be found even in dancing, flute-playing, and lyre-playing. So again in language, whether prose or verse unaccompanied by music. Homer [the epic poet and attributed as author or the Iliad and the Odyssey], for example, makes men better than they are; Cleophon as they are; Hegemon the Thasian, the inventor of parodies, and Nicochares, the author of the Deiliad, worse than they are …

The poet being an imitator, like a painter or any other artist, must of necessity imitate one of three objects—things as they were or are, things as they are said or thought to be, or things as they ought to be …

[T]o learn gives the liveliest pleasure, not only to philosophers but to men in general; whose capacity, however, of learning is more limited. Thus the reason why men enjoy seeing a likeness is, that in contemplating it they find themselves learning or inferring, and saying perhaps, ‘Ah, that is he.’ For if you happen not to have seen the original, the pleasure will be due not to the imitation as such, but to the execution, the coloring, or some such other cause.Imitation, then, is one instinct of our nature.

(1653) Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York,

Aristotle. 350 BCE-c. Poetics. The Internet Classics Archive, MIT.. IV, I, II, XXV, IV.

Chapter 8: Directory || Next